Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | STRAUSS Luke | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 2 | WESTPHAL David R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 3 | LI Patrick | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 3 | BUERGISSER Kai | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% | |
| 5 | GAO Zachary | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 6 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% |
| 7 | OGBORN Teddy (Ty) | - | - | - | 5% | 46% | 49% | |
| 8 | HARR Carver | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 9 | KENT V David | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 10 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 11 | MCCOWN Ronan | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 12 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 47% | |
| 13 | AGGELER Donovan | 4% | 37% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | MACMILLAN Collin | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 30% | 3% | - |
| 16 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | 1% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% | |
| 18 | DANIS Blake M. | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 19 | BARTLETT Christopher | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 20 | PEARSON Heila | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 21 | GAMMILL Luke | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | MCDONALD Connor | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | MU Jason | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 24 | BEALL Milo M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 25 | FUNSTON Lauren L. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | BURBEY Sam | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 27 | MCGOUGH Kevin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 28 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 29 | LEE Jayden J. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | GORMLEY Robert | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 31 | LEWIS Rachel | 20% | 46% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | COLE Matthew | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | SHULL Marc | - | 6% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 1% | |
| 34 | MCADOO Declan | - | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | PETERSON Matthew | - | 1% | 14% | 48% | 31% | 5% | |
| 36 | FRENCH Phaelen | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | - | 6% | 31% | 52% | 10% | - | - |
| 39 | WANG Zoe | 16% | 34% | 31% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 40 | ANDERSON Claire | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 41 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% | |
| 42 | JAMES Ethan | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
| 43 | PEARSON Arwa | 23% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | ANDERSON Donald | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | FAIRBANKS George | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | - | |
| 46 | EYMAN Hans | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 3% | |
| 47 | WHEELER Sterling Anne P. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 48 | RIEBSOMER Ethan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | LETTANG John | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | TIBBLES Nolan | 2% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 51 | BLANCHARD Timothy | 31% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | FOX Alexander | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | ROMERO River | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | SZABO Oliver | 88% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | VAZIRI Maya | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | NUTTYCOMBE Erasmus | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 57 | BADNER- LANE Eliza | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.