Denver Fencing Center - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
2 | WESTPHAL David R. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
3 | LI Patrick | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
3 | BUERGISSER Kai | V V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
5 | GAO Zachary | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
6 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
7 | OGBORN Teddy (Ty) | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | HARR Carver | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
9 | KENT V David | D V V V V V | V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
10 | CHOI Kaiden I. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
11 | MCCOWN Ronan | V D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
12 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
13 | AGGELER Donovan | D V V V V | V V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
14 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
15 | MACMILLAN Collin | D D D V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
16 | ERKENBECK Nathan M. | D D D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
17 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V V D V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
18 | DANIS Blake M. | V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
19 | BARTLETT Christopher | V D V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
20 | PEARSON Heila | D V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
21 | GAMMILL Luke | V V V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
22 | MCDONALD Connor | D V V D V | V D | 0.8 | 3 | +2.2 |
23 | MU Jason | V D D V V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
24 | BEALL Milo M. | D V V D D V | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
25 | FUNSTON Lauren L. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
26 | BURBEY Sam | D V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | MCGOUGH Kevin | D D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
28 | KENT Elizabeth J. | D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
29 | LEE Jayden J. | V D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
30 | GORMLEY Robert | V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
31 | LEWIS Rachel | D V D V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
32 | COLE Matthew | V V D D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
33 | SHULL Marc | V D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
34 | MCADOO Declan | D V V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
35 | PETERSON Matthew | V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
36 | FRENCH Phaelen | V D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
37 | LEEDER Elizabeth | D V V D D V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
37 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | V V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
39 | WANG Zoe | D V D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
40 | ANDERSON Claire | D V D V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
41 | TRIFILETTI Lawrence T. | D V D D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
42 | JAMES Ethan | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
43 | PEARSON Arwa | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
44 | ANDERSON Donald | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
45 | FAIRBANKS George | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
46 | EYMAN Hans | D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
47 | WHEELER Sterling Anne P. | D D D D V | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
48 | RIEBSOMER Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
49 | LETTANG John | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
50 | TIBBLES Nolan | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
51 | BLANCHARD Timothy | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
51 | FOX Alexander | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
53 | ROMERO River | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
54 | SZABO Oliver | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
55 | VAZIRI Maya | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
56 | NUTTYCOMBE Erasmus | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
57 | BADNER- LANE Eliza | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.