The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | DETERING Julian | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | LI Raphael C. | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 5.7 | 4 | -1.7 |
3 | DESAI Nalin H. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
3 | OTAKE Jared K. | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
5 | WYMAN Julian | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
7 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D V V D V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
8 | LING Eddie | V D D D V D | V V V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
9 | BERMENDER Cameron | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
10 | CANLAS Nathan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
11 | MA Andrew | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
12 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
13 | ANDERSON Jacob | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
14 | JAUME Andrei | V D V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
15 | LE Jacob W. | V V D V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
16 | FUKUDA Diego | D D D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
17 | KIM Ryan Y. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | LI Matthew | D V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | V D V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
20 | KIM Daniel Y. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
21 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
23 | SEAL Maximus R. | D V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
24 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | V D D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
25 | MORROW Brenden | D V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
26 | EDISON Ansel | V D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
27 | SETLUR Bhrugu | V D D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
28 | LI Jett | D V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
29 | GORDON William L. | V D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
29 | LAM Nicolas | V V D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
31 | KIM Jonah | V V D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
32 | GETSIN Anthony | D D D D D D | V V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
33 | WANG Ethan | V V V D V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
34 | TUAN Evan | V D V V V V | D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
35 | MA Bryant | D V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
36 | HARRIS Otto | V D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
37 | KIM Aiden | V V V D V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | RASMUSSEN Sage | D V V V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
39 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
40 | WU Lucas | V D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
41 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | D D V V V V | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
41 | NGAI Julian | V V D V D V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
43 | LIU Aaron | V V V D D V | D | 0.7 | 4 | +3.3 |
44 | FULTON Richard A. | D V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
45 | NG Kenneth | D D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
46 | CLAYMAN John A. | V V V D D D | D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
47 | SMITH Grant D. | V D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
48 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | V D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
49 | CHAN Connor | D V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
49 | WONG Evan | D V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
51 | KALAMAS Nikolas | D V D V D V | D | 0.6 | 3 | +2.4 |
52 | PARK Brandon | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
53 | GONZALEZ Matthew | V D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
54 | CRACRAFT John R. | D D V D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
55 | SEEDS Edward T. | D D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
56 | RUBIN Max | D D V V D D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
57 | TANG xianchi | D D V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
58 | PETERSON Lucas | V D D V D D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
59 | LIU William | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
60 | KHER Roan | D D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
61 | SAH Steven | D V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
62 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | D D D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 1 | -2.8 |
63 | BAEK David | D D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
64 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | D D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
65 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
66 | BOUCHARD Kai | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
67 | TSAY Jeremy M. | D D D V D D | D | 4.8 | 1 | -3.8 |
68 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
69 | ADAMS Cedric | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
70 | LUONG Allen | D D D V D D | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
71 | CHUN Dashel | V D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
72 | LEE Jayden J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
73 | MAK Osman K. | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
74 | LUI Justin | D V D D D D | D | 0.1 | 1 | +0.9 |
75 | BECKER Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
76 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
77 | LIANG Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.