The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DETERING Julian | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 2 | LI Raphael C. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 39% | 53% |
| 3 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 5 | WYMAN Julian | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 6 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 7 | MCCOSH Evin M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | LING Eddie | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | BERMENDER Cameron | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 43% |
| 10 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 11 | MA Andrew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 40% | 6% |
| 12 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
| 13 | ANDERSON Jacob | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | JAUME Andrei | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 15 | LE Jacob W. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% |
| 16 | FUKUDA Diego | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 4% |
| 17 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 40% |
| 18 | LI Matthew | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 20 | KIM Daniel Y. | 1% | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 21 | HOSKERI Anik S. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew G. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 23 | SEAL Maximus R. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 24 | ZILINSKIY Eduard | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 49% | 22% |
| 25 | MORROW Brenden | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 26 | EDISON Ansel | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SETLUR Bhrugu | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 28 | LI Jett | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | GORDON William L. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | LAM Nicolas | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | KIM Jonah | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 32 | GETSIN Anthony | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | WANG Ethan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 34 | TUAN Evan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 35 | MA Bryant | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 36 | HARRIS Otto | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Aiden | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | RASMUSSEN Sage | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 40 | WU Lucas | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | VAN SCOYK Aeron I. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 11% |
| 41 | NGAI Julian | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Aaron | 46% | 41% | 11% | 1% | < 1% | - | - |
| 44 | FULTON Richard A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 35% | 9% |
| 45 | NG Kenneth | - | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 46 | CLAYMAN John A. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 47 | SMITH Grant D. | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 48 | MEDVIDOVIC Pavle | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | CHAN Connor | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | WONG Evan | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | PARK Brandon | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 53 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 1% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | CRACRAFT John R. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 55 | SEEDS Edward T. | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 56 | RUBIN Max | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | TANG xianchi | 7% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | PETERSON Lucas | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIU William | 12% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | KHER Roan | 2% | 16% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | SAH Steven | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 63 | BAEK David | - | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 64 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 1% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 65 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | BOUCHARD Kai | 5% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | < 1% | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 21% |
| 68 | AGRAWAL Niki | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 69 | ADAMS Cedric | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 70 | LUONG Allen | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% | 2% |
| 71 | CHUN Dashel | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 72 | LEE Jayden J. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 73 | MAK Osman K. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | LUI Justin | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | BECKER Ethan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 44% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 77 | LIANG Ethan | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.