Brentwood High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 49% | 33% |
| 2 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 3 | ZHENG Haoran | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% |
| 3 | EVERS Gabriel | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 5 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 6 | GAO Chaney C. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | KIM Sullivan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 8 | PAK Elliot | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 9 | WANG Devon | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% |
| 10 | WARD Edward | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 11 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | - | - | - | 5% | 38% | 56% | |
| 12 | RAMOS Russell K. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 14% | |
| 13 | PALMER Nathaniel | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 14 | FERRIERE Joshua | - | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 6% |
| 15 | JU Hanul | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | PEÑA Ethan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 17 | WANG Owen | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 18 | WACZIARG Simon | 1% | 14% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 19 | NAZARIAN Jonah | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 4% |
| 20 | IYER Pranav | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 21 | CROSSMAN Brandon | - | - | 4% | 24% | 51% | 20% | |
| 22 | CHOI San | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 23 | NALBANDIAN Vahan P. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
| 24 | RAINS Jackson T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 25 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | MORTON Joshua | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | MESERVE Max | 7% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | CHEUNG Tian Yi Tim | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 29 | HILL Tobin | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CLARKE Luca | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 31 | DAO Thomas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
| 32 | CHEN Brian | 1% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 33 | PAINTER Noah | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 34 | CORTEZ Julian | 6% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BISSADA Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 36 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 38 | KIM Tristan | 4% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | JUAREZ Semaje | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% | |
| 40 | NA Rongtian | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 41 | NASATIR Serafin | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | YANAI Charlie | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 44 | LARI Matthew | 4% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | HRYNIEWICZ Hudson | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KAMRAS Ryan | 8% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MITTLEMAN Daniel | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 49 | FRIEDMAN Jonas | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 50 | CHEN David | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | SUH Victor | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 52 | PROCTER Griffin | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 53 | XU Jiaqian | 6% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | THORNTON Maximilian | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | PERDIGAO Cooper | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | ADELMAN Samuel | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 57 | CHARETTE Matthew | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | DILORENZO Peter | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MAZZEI Tyler | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 60 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | SAUTER Luke | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ZAPATA Matthew | 14% | 39% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | GLICK Maxwell | 4% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SCHOELZ Riley | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | KELLEY Nasib | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 66 | DIAZ Jairo | 56% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.