Brentwood High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 33% |
| 2 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | ZHENG Haoran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% |
| 3 | EVERS Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 5 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 15% |
| 6 | GAO Chaney C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 6 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 8 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 9 | WANG Devon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 38% |
| 10 | WARD Edward | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 11 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | |
| 12 | RAMOS Russell K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 14% | |
| 13 | PALMER Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 14 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 6% |
| 15 | JU Hanul | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | PEÑA Ethan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 17 | WANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 18 | WACZIARG Simon | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 19 | NAZARIAN Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 4% |
| 20 | IYER Pranav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 21 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 20% | |
| 22 | CHOI San | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | NALBANDIAN Vahan P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
| 24 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 25 | O’CONNOR Nathan (Finn) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | MORTON Joshua | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | MESERVE Max | 100% | 93% | 57% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | CHEUNG Tian Yi Tim | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 8% | - |
| 29 | HILL Tobin | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | CLARKE Luca | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 31 | DAO Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
| 32 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 33 | PAINTER Noah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 34 | CORTEZ Julian | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BISSADA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 36 | NOURAFCHAN Jonah | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% | |
| 38 | KIM Tristan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | JUAREZ Semaje | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% | |
| 40 | NA Rongtian | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | NASATIR Serafin | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | YANAI Charlie | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | GAINSLEY Isaac | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 44 | LARI Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | HRYNIEWICZ Hudson | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 46 | KAMRAS Ryan | 100% | 92% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | MITTLEMAN Daniel | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | FRIEDMAN Lucas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 8% | - | |
| 49 | FRIEDMAN Jonas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 50 | CHEN David | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | SUH Victor | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
| 52 | PROCTER Griffin | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 53 | XU Jiaqian | 100% | 94% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | THORNTON Maximilian | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | PERDIGAO Cooper | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 56 | ADELMAN Samuel | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | DILORENZO Peter | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MAZZEI Tyler | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 60 | SANDOVAL-CUDE Maxwell | 100% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 61 | SAUTER Luke | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 61 | ZAPATA Matthew | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | GLICK Maxwell | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | SCHOELZ Riley | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | KELLEY Nasib | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 66 | DIAZ Jairo | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.