Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 55% |
2 | BING Charles | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
3 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
3 | LI Richard | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 70% |
5 | LI Eric | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
6 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
7 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
8 | WU Alexander | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
9 | GU Andrew | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 6% |
10 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
11 | ZHAI Jeffrey | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
12 | ZHANG Evan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% |
12 | TAN Connor | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
14 | LI Yao (Liam) | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
15 | WANG Mason | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - | |
16 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 8% | |
17 | LI Ayren | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
18 | LEWIS Akhil | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
19 | XU Ethan | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
20 | GAO Anthony | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 33% | 10% |
21 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
22 | CHENG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 37% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | PROMRAT Pete | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | LIU Derek | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - |
26 | PITERBARG Maxim | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
27 | XU Ethan | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
28 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 26% | 51% | 18% |
29 | LI Aaron | - | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
29 | CHEN Derek | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
31 | LIU Jeremiah | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
32 | MATSAKH Philip | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
33 | HU Jason | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
34 | SOLOPOULOS James | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 12% | - |
35 | SIMA Congyu | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
35 | SHAO Eric | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - |
37 | ZHANG Mark | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
38 | BEBER Eli | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
39 | YOU Alex | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
40 | WANG Julang | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
41 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 12% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 38% | 43% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
43 | ZHANG Teddy | 8% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
44 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 9% | 37% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
44 | XIE Buster | 13% | 45% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
47 | WU Andrew Y. | 21% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.