Boston , MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KIM Tei D. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | BING Charles | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 3 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 5 | LI Eric | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | JIANG Owen | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 7 | MIALL Steven A. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 8 | WU Alexander | D V D D V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 9 | GU Andrew | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | MENG Zhaoyi | V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 11 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | ZHANG Evan | D D V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 12 | TAN Connor | V D V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 14 | LI Yao (Liam) | D D V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 15 | WANG Mason | D V V V D | V V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 16 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | D V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LI Ayren | V V D V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 18 | LEWIS Akhil | V V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 19 | XU Ethan | V V V V V D | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | GAO Anthony | V V V D V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 22 | CHENG Ethan | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 23 | PROMRAT Pete | V V D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 24 | LIU Derek | V V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 26 | PITERBARG Maxim | V V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | XU Ethan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | ZHEN Ethan | V D D D V D | V D | 4.8 | 2 | -2.8 |
| 29 | LI Aaron | V D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | CHEN Derek | D D D D V V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 31 | LIU Jeremiah | D D V D D V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 32 | MATSAKH Philip | V D D D D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 33 | HU Jason | D V D D D V | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 34 | SOLOPOULOS James | V D D V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 35 | SIMA Congyu | D D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 35 | SHAO Eric | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 37 | ZHANG Mark | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | BEBER Eli | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 39 | YOU Alex | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 40 | WANG Julang | D D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 41 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 42 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 43 | ZHANG Teddy | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 44 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 44 | XIE Buster | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 46 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 47 | WU Andrew Y. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.