ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 2 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% | |
| 3 | PITERBARG Maxim | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 3 | REZA Farazi | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 5 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
| 6 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 7 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% | |
| 8 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
| 9 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 10 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 11 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 12 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 13 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 14 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
| 15 | GLEBA Nico | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | LEUNG Jin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | |
| 19 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 22% |
| 20 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | ABRAMSOHN Seth | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | |
| 22 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 23 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | 9% | |
| 24 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | NICOLL James | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 27 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 28 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 30 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 81% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | TJON Calum | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 36 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 37 | NICOLL William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 38 | HARRA Alexander | 100% | 95% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | BAI Brian | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 100% | 96% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 42 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% | |
| 43 | WILSON Eric | 100% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 76% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | VALENTINE David | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | LORANGER Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 47 | GAO Payton | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 96% | 79% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 49 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | MENDEZ Ren | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LEVIN Jack | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.