ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | KUGLER Luke | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 2 | DURKIN Hudson | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | LIU Adam | V V V D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 3 | MEN Junda | D V V D D | V V V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 5 | SONG Troy | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 7 | SINGLETON Aman | V D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 8 | KIM Henry | D D V V D V | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 9 | ATKINS Levi H. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 10 | LI Jade | V V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 6 | +3.5 |
| 11 | ROLAND Mackinley | V V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 12 | CHEN Jayden | V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 13 | CAO Ray | D V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 14 | NILSEN Mark | V V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 15 | ZENG Andrew | V V D D V D | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 16 | DOUBOV Andrew | V D D D V D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | V D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 18 | XIA Dashan | V V D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 19 | SEOW Daniel | D D V V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 20 | WONG Maximus | V V D V D V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 21 | FEINBERG James Y. | D D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | GLUSHKOV David | V V V D D D | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 23 | SCHAUER Oliver | V D D V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 24 | FENG Shang | V D V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 26 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | D D V D D V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | NAKAS Levent | D V D V D D | V D | 5.5 | 2 | -3.5 |
| 28 | LI Morgan | D D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | MARIN Ayan N. | D D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 30 | KRAUSS Judah | D V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 31 | LI Ray | D D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | WANG-SONG Evan | D D D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 33 | OCONNOR Paul | D V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | NOVOJILOV Daniel | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 35 | KANG Brandon | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 36 | NORMILE Nicholas | D V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 37 | TESFAYE Elias | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 38 | NOOL Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 39 | BARATY Teagan | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 40 | AHMED Mohsen | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 41 | FOGEL Jake | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.