ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
2 | YU Haochen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
3 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 6% | |
3 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% |
5 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
6 | ULYSSE Jacob | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
7 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 1% | |
8 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
9 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
10 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
11 | CHANG Parker | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
12 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 12% |
13 | LIU Gene | 100% | 92% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
14 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | - |
15 | WU Wallace | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
16 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | 1% |
17 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
18 | LU Hansen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 10% | |
19 | XU Terrance | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
20 | PAN Xijun | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
21 | CHAE Emmett | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
22 | SIU Max | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
23 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
24 | JI Derek | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | |
25 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
26 | HUANG Dalynn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
27 | TU Nathan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
28 | SHOU Raymond | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
29 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | |
30 | SHARMA Ari | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
31 | HWANG Jayden | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | HWANG Jacob | 100% | 94% | 68% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
33 | GUGALA Frank | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 3% | - |
34 | YUNG Zak | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
35 | ZHAO David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
36 | LIU jeremy | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | |
37 | CHOI Hunter | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
38 | CAO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 48% | 7% | |
39 | MARTINSON Finn | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
40 | HONG Thomas | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | HAN Jiaren | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
42 | LIU Brady | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
43 | ZHONG Kingsley | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
44 | CHONG Cooper | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
45 | KIM Ian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.