ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% |
2 | WANG Robert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
3 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
3 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
5 | TRUDNOS Allen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% |
6 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
7 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
8 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% |
9 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
10 | WONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
11 | TENG MATTHEW | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 11% |
12 | PRIMUS Nazir | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 13% |
13 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
14 | THORNHILL Kwasi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
15 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
16 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
17 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
18 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 21% | |
19 | LEE Aydan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
20 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
21 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
22 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
23 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
24 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
25 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
26 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
27 | GUALTERO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
28 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
29 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
30 | WANG Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
31 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
32 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
33 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
34 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
35 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
36 | YOO Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
37 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
38 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
39 | HOPPA Luke H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% |
40 | KASPER Aaron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
41 | KOGAN Nikita | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
42 | VAROQUA Nalby | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
43 | WEBER Mattias A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
44 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 13% | |
46 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
46 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
48 | ENGEL Peter | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
49 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% | 1% |
50 | POSY Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
51 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 89% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
52 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
53 | KOVACH Jonah F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
54 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
55 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
56 | CHEN Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
57 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% | |
58 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
59 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | SLODYCZKA Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
61 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
62 | MATTOO Surya | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
63 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
64 | SMITH Vaughn | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
65 | LAUB William | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
66 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 23% | 3% |
67 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
67 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
69 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
70 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - |
71 | BODKIN Jake M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
72 | BHATIA Ekam | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
74 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
75 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 99% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
76 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
77 | ZHENG LEON | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
78 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
79 | KAUFFMAN James | 100% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
80 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
81 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
82 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 92% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
83 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
84 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | OU Brian | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
86 | SEN Christian | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
86 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | |
88 | LEE Anderson | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
89 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
89 | KEIPER Benjamin | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
91 | JAVIDI Michael | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
92 | FERTIL Ethan | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
93 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | LIGH Checed | 100% | 62% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.