Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHIN Sungmoon (Andy) | - | - | - | - | 3% | 32% | 65% |
| 2 | TREBON Hayden | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 43% | 11% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% | |
| 3 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 5 | FULLERTON Houston T. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
| 6 | MALLOY Patrick G. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 23% | |
| 7 | JOSEPH William | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% |
| 8 | HUTTO Joshua | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 9 | TIYA BIAYA K. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 10 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | - | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% |
| 11 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
| 11 | BLAND Ian A. | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 56% | 18% |
| 11 | ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 14 | NAIK Saininad | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 20% |
| 15 | WANG Bryan | - | 4% | 28% | 44% | 21% | 2% | |
| 16 | WANG Maxwell L. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 9% | |
| 17 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 47% | 37% |
| 17 | WANG Aidan | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 19 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 20 | LIM Joshua | - | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 2% |
| 21 | KIM Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 48% | 30% |
| 22 | CLAYTON Robert | - | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 23 | ZHOU Alec Q. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 24 | DANZIG Jacob S. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 24 | NORMAN Christian | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 26 | AWAN Saqlain A. | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 43% | 20% | 3% |
| 27 | BUI Henry | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 28 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 29 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 30 | LIN Kason | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 31 | ALLEY Everett T | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 32 | BROWN Hannah | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 33 | LEWIS Jared | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 34 | LANGE Eric A. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 35 | LIU Dylan Y. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 36 | JAAFAR Omar | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% | |
| 37 | TEITENBERG John F. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 38 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 39 | TOUSSAINT Semaj | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 40 | PARCELEWICZ John M. | - | 4% | 25% | 43% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 41 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 12% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 43 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 1% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 44 | RAY William | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
| 46 | BASKIN Miles | - | 7% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | MAXWELL Austin | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 48 | PRICE Jordan | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | HAN Ethan | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 51 | NG Joshua Z. | - | 2% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 52 | LENAHAN Conor J. | - | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
| 53 | LANGUASCO Michael | 21% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CORLEY Avery | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 55 | PAK Joel | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | WEBB Jacob T. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 57 | ELLIOTT Wyatt | - | 7% | 37% | 40% | 14% | 1% | |
| 58 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 59 | LE Kevin | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | WOLF Christopher | 1% | 18% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 61 | BENATER Lauren | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% |
| 62 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 63 | ILENRE Roni | 18% | 57% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | FREY Wayne N. | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 66 | CHOI Adam | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 67 | SMITH Andrew | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 68 | SAYLOR David A. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | 1% | 12% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 70 | MCFARLAND John G. | - | 11% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ROCKWELL Nolan | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | WALKER Cory S. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 73 | CHUNG Joshua | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 74 | BLAIR Hailey | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 75 | JUNG Elliot | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 76 | WILLIAMS Eli | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 77 | LEE Daehyeon | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - | - |
| 78 | BELL Adam | 6% | 45% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | KOTHA Maanas | 23% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 80 | RASSEL John | 27% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 81 | RYU Nathaniel | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 82 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 83 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 83 | PEREVORUKHOV Ivan | 19% | 43% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | HAYES Zackery | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 86 | FERRARO Nicholas | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | ROBINSON Blake | 40% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 88 | KEMLE Brian | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | CROSS Phoenix | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | GHOLSTON Alex | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 91 | CULLEN Reilly | 66% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | BRYANT Benjamin | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 93 | SEATON Jake | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 95 | HONG Robin | 59% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.