NorCal Courts - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VERON Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 2 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
| 3 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% | |
| 3 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 5 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 | BUROV Artem | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 7 | REICHMANN Theo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
| 8 | WANG Devin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 9 | KIM Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 13% |
| 10 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 11 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 13 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 14 | GORDON David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 15 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 16 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 17 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
| 18 | FU Adrian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 19 | QIAO James | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | MA Ryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 23 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | ZHU Owen | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | LIU Max | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 27 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 28 | MANA Sameer | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 29 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 30 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | WONG Kingston | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | GUPTA Hemansh | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 36 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | YU Alex | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 38 | NARAYANUN Advay | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | XIE andrew | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | KLINKNER Charlie | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | DAVIS Stewart | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.