Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FAYEZ Ayman A. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
| 2 | BOGERT James BRETT (Brett) | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 3 | HANSEN Jonas B. | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 3 | WERRELL Jack | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 5 | SANTOS Cameron A. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 6 | HONDOR Robert D. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 7 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 8 | DOLGONOS Mark | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | KIM Derek D. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | < 1% |
| 9 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 37% | 55% |
| 11 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 2% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 12 | HILLYER Rourke W. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 4% | |
| 13 | YU Colin | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 14 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% | |
| 15 | MILLER Finn S. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | STONE Brian M. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 17 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% |
| 18 | KOKENGE Clark | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 19 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 2% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 20 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 21 | BASOK Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | INSLER Gabriel C. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 23 | CHA Russell W. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 24 | MARCHANT Albert J. | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 42% | 7% | |
| 25 | HERGERT Earl | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 26 | LAFVING Brandon | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 27 | LEIGH David A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 28 | MRAK Michael R. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SCOTT Oscar W. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KANG Michael H. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 31 | RYAN Joshua P. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | GIBSON Nowell L. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | STUSNICK Hunter | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 34 | FENWICK Luke A. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | |
| 35 | BOGERT Alexander BRYCE (Bryce) | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 36 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% |
| 37 | BEACH Nicholas | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 38 | KIM Juni C. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 47% | 35% |
| 39 | AYAN Ege | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 39 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 41 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 42 | KLINE R. Jay | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 44 | PLUMER Jack E. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 44 | ARMSTRONG James G. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 46 | WOLF Myles J. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 47 | GANA Thomas A. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MCGOVERN Vincent J. | - | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 49 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 50 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 11% | 37% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | BAKER Kevin G. | 7% | 37% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | HAO Jerry | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | TAE William G. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% | |
| 56 | BURKE Matthew C. | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LUKANYUK Lorence | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 58 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 59 | SHINE Peter C. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% |
| 60 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 1% | 9% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 61 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 63 | GANESAN Vinayak | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 64 | SPAHN Jeff | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | WOLOSINSKI Peter | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 67 | ZHANG Matthew | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 68 | KUMAR Anitya | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 69 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 70 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 71 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 72 | BEKKER Mitchel | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 73 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 74 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 75 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 76 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 77 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | CONNELL Jay | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | KIM Brad K. | 3% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 80 | KWONG Jason | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 81 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 82 | GREGORY Abram | - | < 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% | |
| 83 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
| 84 | LI Brian | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | HUANG Forest | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 86 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | SINGCUENCO Lance | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 88 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 17% | 43% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | CHEN Junle R. | 17% | 44% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 90 | PARK Minchan | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 91 | PARTE Aidan | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 92 | SPANO Gideon S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.