Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FAYEZ Ayman A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
2 | BOGERT James BRETT (Brett) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
3 | HANSEN Jonas B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
3 | WERRELL Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
5 | SANTOS Cameron A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
6 | HONDOR Robert D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
7 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
8 | DOLGONOS Mark | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
9 | KIM Derek D. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | < 1% |
9 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
11 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 100% | 98% | 74% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
12 | HILLYER Rourke W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
13 | YU Colin | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% | |
15 | MILLER Finn S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
16 | STONE Brian M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
17 | BOWERMAN Lucas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 48% | 15% |
18 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | |
19 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
21 | BASOK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
22 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
23 | CHA Russell W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
24 | MARCHANT Albert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 7% | |
25 | HERGERT Earl | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
26 | LAFVING Brandon | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | LEIGH David A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
28 | MRAK Michael R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
29 | SCOTT Oscar W. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
30 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
31 | RYAN Joshua P. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | |
32 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
33 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
34 | FENWICK Luke A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | |
35 | BOGERT Alexander BRYCE (Bryce) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 6% |
36 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 15% |
37 | BEACH Nicholas | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
38 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 35% |
39 | AYAN Ege | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
39 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
41 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
42 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
43 | PAVLENISHVILI David G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
44 | PLUMER Jack E. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
44 | ARMSTRONG James G. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
46 | WOLF Myles J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
47 | GANA Thomas A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
48 | MCGOVERN Vincent J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% |
49 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
50 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
50 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
52 | BAKER Kevin G. | 100% | 93% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | |
53 | HAO Jerry | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
54 | TAE William G. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
55 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
56 | BURKE Matthew C. | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
57 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
58 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
59 | SHINE Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% |
60 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - |
61 | CHERNYSHOV Max | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
62 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | |
63 | GANESAN Vinayak | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
64 | SPAHN Jeff | 100% | 85% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
65 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | |
66 | WOLOSINSKI Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
67 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
68 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
69 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
70 | ROBERTS Samuel E. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
71 | BONIN Jr. Christopher J. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | BEKKER Mitchel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
73 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
74 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
75 | MOYSE Alexander S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
76 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
77 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
78 | CONNELL Jay | 100% | 81% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
79 | KIM Brad K. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
80 | KWONG Jason | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
81 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
82 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 32% | |
83 | CHAUDHRY Rafay | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
84 | LI Brian | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
85 | HUANG Forest | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
86 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
87 | SINGCUENCO Lance | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
88 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
89 | CHEN Junle R. | 100% | 83% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | |
90 | PARK Minchan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | |
91 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
92 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.