Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ARCHER Kristjan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | LIMA Kevin M. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | V D V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 5 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | RITCHIE Luke W. | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 7 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 8 | TIAN Aaron C. | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 9 | POLANSKY Solomon | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | GORDON Jacob | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | PHILPOT Evan E. | D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 12 | PAULSON Connor M. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | GU Jeffrey | D V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 14 | BUERGIN Aidan | V V D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | MCOWEN Peter D. | D D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 16 | RINEHART Conner M. | D V D V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | V V V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 18 | GISLER Benjamin B. | V V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 19 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V V D V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 20 | SELL Ethan J. | V D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 21 | CRAYTON Royce S. | V V V D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 22 | ROUNTREE Rob | V V V D D D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 23 | LIU Eric Y. | V D D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 24 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 25 | DABNEY Justin | D D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | D V D D D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | EVANS Aidan | D D D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | HENSLEY Todd | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | JUSTUS Benjamin | D D V D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | MCKEVITT Conner M. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 31 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | DRESSEL Jet | D D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 33 | GAO William | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | GRISWOLD Doug | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | SHEA William | D D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 36 | WANG Waley | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | ROSEBERRY Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 38 | YOUNG William | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 39 | ROGERS Windell | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 40 | HERNANDEZ Agustin | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.