Catonsville, MD - Catonsville, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ARCHER Kristjan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 2 | LIMA Kevin M. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 3 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 12% | |
| 3 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 39% | |
| 5 | JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
| 6 | RITCHIE Luke W. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 44% |
| 7 | SERCK-HANSSEN Peter E. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
| 8 | TIAN Aaron C. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 9 | POLANSKY Solomon | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 52% | 36% |
| 10 | GORDON Jacob | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 11 | PHILPOT Evan E. | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 2% | |
| 12 | PAULSON Connor M. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 13 | GU Jeffrey | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 14 | BUERGIN Aidan | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | MCOWEN Peter D. | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 16 | RINEHART Conner M. | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% | |
| 18 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 20 | SELL Ethan J. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | CRAYTON Royce S. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
| 22 | ROUNTREE Rob | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | LIU Eric Y. | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 25 | DABNEY Justin | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 26 | MULLIGAN Timothy (Tim) D. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 27 | EVANS Aidan | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | HENSLEY Todd | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 29 | JUSTUS Benjamin | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | MCKEVITT Conner M. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | DRESSEL Jet | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | GAO William | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - | - |
| 34 | GRISWOLD Doug | 3% | 28% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SHEA William | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 36 | WANG Waley | 26% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | ROSEBERRY Daniel | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | YOUNG William | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | ROGERS Windell | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | HERNANDEZ Agustin | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.