SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 2 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 3 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 3 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 5 | WANG Luke | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
| 6 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 4% |
| 7 | REN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 8 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 9 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | < 1% |
| 10 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 6% |
| 11 | YU William | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 10% | |
| 12 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% | |
| 13 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 15 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | 5% | |
| 16 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 19 | XU Nathan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 20 | KO Caleb | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 1% | |
| 21 | LEE Thomas | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 22 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 2% |
| 23 | BAGRINTSEV Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 10% |
| 25 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 26 | XIAN kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 27 | MANDELBAUM Oliver | 100% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | CHOI Jaeden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% | |
| 29 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
| 30 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 31 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | NOVIKOV Yann | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | WU Isaac | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 35 | JOHN Meru | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | SIU Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 38 | HU Michael | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | HARRY Ryan | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 41 | BRAIZINHA David | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | HU Daniel | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 43 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 2% | |
| 44 | HARRY Landen | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 1% |
| 46 | LI Jayden | 100% | 89% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | SAMUEL Lucas | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 48 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | GRACEY Gavin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 50 | LIU Gene | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 41% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 52 | WEZWICK Luke | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 53 | SHARMA Sharray | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.