Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 2 | KIM Julian | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 39% | 6% |
| 3 | RONG Marcus | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 3 | ENG Kyler | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 5 | XUE Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
| 6 | TANG Michael | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 7 | MA Nolan | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 9 | WU MiEr | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% | |
| 10 | DING Max | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 11 | ROBERTS Arthur | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% | |
| 12 | LI Bryan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 13 | MOSLEY Wally | 2% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 14 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 15 | TUBALTSEV Evan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
| 16 | SHIH Derek | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | WU Nathan | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 18 | WONG Alexander | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 19 | FU Nolan | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 20 | DU Evan | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 22 | LI Stephen | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
| 23 | CHEN Aiden | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 32% | 2% |
| 24 | GUO Jonathan | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 25 | MA kevin | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | NIU Alexandre | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 27 | LIU Aiden | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
| 28 | SHOURIE Seth | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 29 | KIM Evan | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 30 | WONG Kyle | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | SHOURIE Neel | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HUA Nolan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 34 | THOMPSON Luca | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 35 | YOO Lucas | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 36 | CHEN Christopher | 16% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Zhihan | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 38 | SUNWOO Brady | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 39 | LIN Daniel | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | LIU Xuyao | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | FAYEZ Adam | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 42 | BOROVIKOV Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 43 | JU Shang | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | WANG Lucas | - | 5% | 18% | 32% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 45 | MAZAHERI John | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | BAI Hang Qi | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | BAEK Joel | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | LI Vance | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | TU JUNZHE | - | 2% | 24% | 45% | 25% | 4% | |
| 50 | ZHAO Luke | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 51 | LIU Zeyar | 9% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | YANG Rony | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | HWANG Matthew | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LIU Yihong | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | SUNG Robin | - | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | ZHANG William | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | FONG Ethan | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | WANG Mason | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | DAI Bo | 53% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | NG Asten | < 1% | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 62 | SHARMA Mihir | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 63 | LIN Bryan | 1% | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
| 64 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | LEE Lucas | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 66 | LEE Aaron | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.