Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WU Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 2 | PARK Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | THAKUR Om S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | SVERDLOV Seth | V D D V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 5 | TRULL A.J. | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 6 | ZENG Andrew | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 7 | SIYANKO Joshua | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | D D V D V D | V V V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 9 | SANTOS Francisco M. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | KRISHNAN Skanda | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | XI Benjamin | V V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | KUGLER Luke | V V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | ALABI Tobi | D V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 14 | PETROV Niki A. | D V D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | CZEPLA Andrew | V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 16 | XIE Brandon | V D D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 17 | LAI Boden | V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 18 | REPIC Oliver | D V V V V D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 19 | JONELEIT Aidan | V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | SANTOS Antonio K. | D D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 21 | GLUSHKOV David | V D V D V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 22 | LIU Adam | D D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | ZHANG Roland | V V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 24 | MEN Junda | V D D V V D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 25 | WU Colin | D V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 26 | SETO Jing | D V D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 27 | KARIMOV Amir | D V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 28 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | V D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | LIU Ethan | D V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | WONG King-Yee | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 31 | HIGGASON Hugh | D D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 32 | KANG Brandon | V D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | YU Samuel | V D V D D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 34 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 35 | LI Jade | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | LI Ray | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | SCHAUER Oliver | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 38 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
| 39 | MALHAM Andrew | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 40 | LI Jaden | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 41 | DUSSELDORP Max | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.