Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 2 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | THAKUR Om S. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 48% | 14% |
| 3 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 28% |
| 5 | TRULL A.J. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 6 | ZENG Andrew | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | SIYANKO Joshua | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | KRISHNAN Skanda | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 11 | XI Benjamin | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 12 | KUGLER Luke | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | ALABI Tobi | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | PETROV Niki A. | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% | |
| 15 | CZEPLA Andrew | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | XIE Brandon | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 17 | LAI Boden | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 18 | REPIC Oliver | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 19 | JONELEIT Aidan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | SANTOS Antonio K. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 21 | GLUSHKOV David | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 22 | LIU Adam | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | ZHANG Roland | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 24 | MEN Junda | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
| 25 | WU Colin | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 26 | SETO Jing | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KARIMOV Amir | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 28 | SARIDAKIS Ioannis Thanos | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 29 | LIU Ethan | 25% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | WONG King-Yee | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | HIGGASON Hugh | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | KANG Brandon | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | YU Samuel | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 34 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | LI Jade | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LI Ray | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SCHAUER Oliver | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | MALHAM Andrew | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 40 | LI Jaden | 3% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | DUSSELDORP Max | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.