Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHOMAN Zachary | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 2 | HUANG Ethan F. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 3 | MARGULIES William | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3 | CHTERENTAL Alex | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% | |
| 5 | SHOMAN Noah | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 6 | SLASTIN Andrew | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 30% |
| 7 | DENG Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 8 | DOLAN Charles R. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 9 | LIU Lawrence | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | PAN Alex | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 11 | TENG Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 12 | MICLAUS Justin | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% |
| 13 | KILGALLEN William | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 3% |
| 14 | KANG evan R. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 15 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | LUTHRA Arjun | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 15% | |
| 17 | ZHOU Miles | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 18 | HAN Daniel Y. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 43% | 12% |
| 18 | TRUDNOS Allen | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 20 | STAMIS Kyle | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | FIGUEREDO Adrian | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 22 | ENGEL Peter | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | GLOZMAN Justin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 24 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | - | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
| 25 | GUFFEY Christopher | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 26 | HONG Steven | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 21% | |
| 27 | BROU Inkosi | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
| 28 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | DOWNEY Baran | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% | |
| 30 | OH Triton | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 31 | WEN Edward | - | 1% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 32 | SHAH Sajan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 34 | HUANG Connor | 1% | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 36 | HO Kaden M. | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
| 37 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | - | 5% | 23% | 47% | 25% | |
| 38 | NGUYEN Anthony | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
| 39 | PANDEY Neil | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 40 | KIM ELIJAH | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
| 41 | WANG Weiyun | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 42 | FANG Eason | 9% | 42% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | KESSLER Josh | 7% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | GONG Jerry | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 45 | MATTOO Surya | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 45 | NG Jeremiah | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 47 | NG Jonathan | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | POSY Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | XU Justin | 27% | 44% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | TASIKAS Stylianos | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | FALCON-KORB Mathis | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 52 | CHEN Jonathan | - | 8% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 54 | LIU Kevin | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 55 | LAU Justin Y. | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 56 | WU Richard | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 56 | SAVOY Luca | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 58 | FIELDS Matthew S. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 59 | TIAGI Daniel | 1% | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 60 | BOULAIS Andrew D. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 61 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | PERRON Robert | - | 6% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 63 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 64 | BUCK Maximilian | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | FREDRICK Jameer | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 66 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 67 | KIM Matthew | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 68 | BONDARENCO Vlad | - | 2% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | BERA Enzo | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
| 70 | FELDMAN Drew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | HUANG Tom | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 72 | KESSLER Nathan | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 73 | LIGH Checed | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | BODKIN Jake M. | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 75 | CHENG Hong | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 76 | CHEN Evan P. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 76 | PIWOWAR Alex | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 78 | CHEN Samuel | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 79 | EDELMAN Seth A. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 80 | MARGULIS Jared | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 81 | WAGNER Calvin | 13% | 44% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | KUMAR Arjun | 6% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | PARRA Rodrigo | 64% | 34% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | ZHOU Grant | 18% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | KIM Theodore | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 86 | COURTIN Frederic | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 87 | ZHAO Lucas | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 88 | DELISSER Matthew | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | DESAUTELS Connor | 5% | 42% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | TIAGI George | 9% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | WANG Yufei | 26% | 61% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | BARROWS Hunter | 52% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | SADHU Neiyam | 49% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
| 94 | HENDERSON Jack | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 95 | POLESHUCK KINEL Gil | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 96 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | DRZEWICZEWSKI Sean | 11% | 44% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | FARAON Paulus | 20% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 98 | SUN Benjamin | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 100 | KUPER Tristan | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.