Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WONG Anthony M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% | |
2 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% | |
3 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
3 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
5 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
6 | NGUYEN Jett | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
7 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
8 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | FORTNER Lance R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% | |
10 | CATLIN Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% |
11 | KELLY William J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
12 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
13 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
14 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
15 | AVRON Case B. | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
16 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 9% | |
17 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 11% |
18 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
19 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
20 | CHIN Jason Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% |
21 | SCHENCK Theo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
22 | HSIUNG Richie | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
23 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
24 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | |
25 | WOMACH Tristan | 100% | 86% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
26 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
27 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 78% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
28 | CHOI Samuel | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | WHARTON Zachary | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
30 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
31 | KO Tyler B. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
32 | SWEENEY Quinn | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - |
33 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
34 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
35 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - |
36 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
37 | KIM BANSEOK | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
38 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 89% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
40 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
43 | NAM Michael | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.