Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 24% |
2 | STRAYER Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
3 | LAKEHAL-AYAT Anil | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | |
3 | ZHEN Ethan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
5 | PLASTARAS Trey | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
6 | MAGALONG William | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
7 | GE Daniel | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
8 | FENG Michael | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
9 | WANG Brian | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% | |
10 | CHO Tyler H. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
11 | WANG Rory | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
12 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 4% | 19% | 35% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
13 | NICOLSON William | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - | |
14 | TJON Calum | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
15 | PEDERSEN Charles | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
16 | TANG xianchi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
17 | XU Ethan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
18 | ROBINS Brennan | - | 4% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 3% | |
19 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
20 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
21 | SANTIAGO Elias | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 14% | |
22 | GERRISH William | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
23 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
24 | GLEBA Nico | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 29% | 4% | |
25 | LEUNG Jin | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
26 | CHENG Austyn | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
27 | AMRANI David | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
28 | RNO Kyler | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | HUNTER Phillip | 3% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
30 | MONTALBINE Aidan | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
31 | WOHLERS Trevor | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
32 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 1% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
33 | TAM Kyle | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
34 | SURESH Rohan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | MCQUIDE elliot | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
36 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 3% | 30% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
37 | CANEDO James | 37% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | HOE Kenneth Y. | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
39 | CRUZ ZURITA Leonardo | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
40 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | NERI Stephen | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | GRANADOS Luis | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
43 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
44 | RUPP Keegan E. | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.