Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
2 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
3 | LAKEHAL-AYAT Anil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
3 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
5 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
6 | MAGALONG William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
7 | GE Daniel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
8 | FENG Michael | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 23% | |
10 | CHO Tyler H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
11 | WANG Rory | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
12 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
13 | NICOLSON William | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
14 | TJON Calum | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
15 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 85% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
16 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
17 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
18 | ROBINS Brennan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% | 3% | |
19 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
20 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
21 | SANTIAGO Elias | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
22 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
23 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - | |
24 | GLEBA Nico | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 4% | |
25 | LEUNG Jin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
26 | CHENG Austyn | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
27 | AMRANI David | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
28 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | HUNTER Phillip | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
30 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 37% | 6% | |
31 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
32 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
33 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
34 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | MCQUIDE elliot | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - | |
36 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 97% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
37 | CANEDO James | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | HOE Kenneth Y. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
39 | CRUZ ZURITA Leonardo | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
40 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
41 | NERI Stephen | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
42 | GRANADOS Luis | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
43 | MANLAPAZ Jan Vincent | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
44 | RUPP Keegan E. | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.