New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 2 | BAKSHI Aman | D D V D V | V V V V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 3 | MO Ethan | D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 5 | TOOMRE Kai | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 6 | WONG Jacob W. | V D V V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 7 | BAI Austin | V V V V D | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | CHEN Ethan | V D V V V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 9 | ZENG Rick | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | ONIK Ari N. | V V V D V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 11 | TANG Royce | V V V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | ZHANG Hanru | V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 13 | KUO Phineas | V V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
| 14 | CHEN kenneth | V V D V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | WANG Ancen | D V V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | SIU Max | D V V D D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 17 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 18 | KO Caleb | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | ZHENG Austin | V V D V V V | V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
| 20 | HUANG Jinyao | V V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 21 | XIAN Kevin | V D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 22 | KIAYIAS Alexander | V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 23 | QIAN Zekai | V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 24 | XU Nathan | V V D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 25 | SAMUEL Lucas | V V D V D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | LIU Gene | D V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 27 | ZHAI Derrick | D D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 28 | KOVACS Harrison | D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | XIE Jicheng | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 30 | CHANG Parker | D D D D V | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 31 | BAS Jonathan | D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | ZHANG Ethan | V D D D D | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 33 | PLUMMER Waylon | D V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 34 | ULYSSE Jacob | D D V V V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 35 | KINGSLEY Griffin | D V V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 36 | REN Ryan | V D D D V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 37 | LU Hansen | D V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 38 | BRAIZINHA David | V V V D D D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 39 | BEYDOUN Sam | D D D V V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 40 | HARRY Landen | V V D D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 41 | MOON Nicolas | D D V V D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
| 41 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 43 | JOHN Meru | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 44 | KIM Daniel | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 45 | WANG Mendy | D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | TANG Michael | V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 47 | HARRY Ryan | D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 48 | ZHANG Zijie | D D D D V | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 49 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 50 | LIN Qianzhong | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 51 | XU Lucas | D D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 52 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 0 | -3.5 |
| 53 | MANDELBAUM Oliver | D D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 0 | -2.8 |
| 54 | KRZYWON Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 55 | CHOI Jaeden | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 56 | LEE Aeden | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 57 | SCHENSUL Lukas | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.