New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 53% | |
| 2 | BAKSHI Aman | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 3 | MO Ethan | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 3 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
| 5 | TOOMRE Kai | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 6 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 7 | BAI Austin | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 8 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 40% | 47% |
| 9 | ZENG Rick | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 10 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | TANG Royce | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
| 12 | ZHANG Hanru | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 13 | KUO Phineas | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 14 | CHEN kenneth | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 15 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 14% | 42% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 16 | SIU Max | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 17 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
| 18 | KO Caleb | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Austin | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 20 | HUANG Jinyao | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 21 | XIAN Kevin | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 41% | 13% |
| 22 | KIAYIAS Alexander | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 23 | QIAN Zekai | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 24 | XU Nathan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 25 | SAMUEL Lucas | 12% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | LIU Gene | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 27 | ZHAI Derrick | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | KOVACS Harrison | 1% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | XIE Jicheng | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | |
| 30 | CHANG Parker | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 31 | BAS Jonathan | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ZHANG Ethan | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | PLUMMER Waylon | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 34 | ULYSSE Jacob | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 35 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 36 | REN Ryan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 37 | LU Hansen | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | BRAIZINHA David | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | BEYDOUN Sam | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | HARRY Landen | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | MOON Nicolas | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | BRADFORD-WATT Ezra | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | JOHN Meru | 6% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | KIM Daniel | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Mendy | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 46 | TANG Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 41% | 11% | |
| 47 | HARRY Ryan | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | ZHANG Zijie | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | LIN Qianzhong | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | XU Lucas | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | AYYAGARI Abhiram | < 1% | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 53 | MANDELBAUM Oliver | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 54 | KRZYWON Dylan | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CHOI Jaeden | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 56 | LEE Aeden | 3% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 57 | SCHENSUL Lukas | 2% | 20% | 44% | 28% | 6% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.