Raleigh SJCC & Division II North American Cup

Div II Men's Foil

Friday, June 2, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 LE Jacob W. - - 2% 10% 29% 41% 19%
2 QIAN Jason H. - - 2% 10% 30% 39% 19%
3 WILLIAMS Connor J. - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
3 SONG Austin - 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
5 BROWN Darius D. - 5% 21% 36% 28% 9% 1%
6 KRYLTSOV Michael - - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
7 ZHANG Aaron - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 10%
8 LIU Zixian (Aaron) - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
9 STRAYER Andrew - - - 5% 22% 44% 30%
10 KALIPERSAD Neil A. - 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3%
11 DAVIDSON Elliot - 1% 5% 21% 37% 28% 7%
12 TAN Christien - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
13 YAO Bradley - 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1%
14 RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
15 DINSAY Kristjan - - 3% 15% 33% 34% 14%
16 LEE Brendan - 2% 11% 28% 35% 20% 5%
17 FINLEY Dylan - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
18 TEMPLE Jackson - - 1% 9% 37% 53%
19 OH Jaden - - 3% 13% 32% 37% 16%
20 MYERS Dean - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 23%
21 WANG Rory 19% 39% 30% 10% 2% -
22 JIANG Bowang - 6% 23% 37% 27% 7%
23 STRINGER David - 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
24 DERRICK Blake - 1% 8% 23% 35% 26% 7%
25 YAP Nathan - 3% 14% 29% 32% 18% 4%
26 EDWARDS Maxon 5% 23% 38% 27% 7% -
27 WANG Brayden 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% 1%
28 HAMILTON Brock B. - - 3% 16% 34% 34% 12%
29 MEJIA MATTHEW D. - - 2% 11% 31% 40% 17%
30 KAPOOR Aayan 1% 7% 24% 36% 24% 7% 1%
31 KIM Andy 9% 29% 36% 20% 5% 1%
32 RIPA Joseph K. 41% 40% 15% 3% - - -
33 CAPRA Ethan 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 2%
34 TANG Albert - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 16%
34 MAO Lucas - 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 5%
36 KETTELLE John 1% 9% 24% 33% 23% 8% 1%
37 XIE Buster - 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
38 AKYAMAC Bora - 3% 16% 34% 34% 12%
39 TANG August L. - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
40 VANOYEN Dominick 6% 25% 37% 25% 7% 1%
41 KIM Brian 1% 16% 35% 31% 14% 3% -
42 XU Andy P. - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 11%
43 KOVACS Wyatt - 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
44 LI Allen 5% 20% 33% 28% 12% 2% -
45 TANG xianchi 5% 25% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
46 SHAPIRO Leon 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
47 GE Daniel 14% 34% 32% 16% 4% - -
48 IVANENKO Alex 1% 13% 33% 34% 16% 3%
49 TIKHAEV Alexander 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
50 TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. - 2% 13% 35% 40% 11%
51 WU Lucas - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 3%
52 ROUNTREE Rob - - 2% 11% 29% 38% 20%
53 ORNELAS Matteo 28% 41% 23% 7% 1% - -
54 FENG Michael 6% 26% 40% 22% 5% 1% -
55 MCISAAC Finn 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3%
56 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 4% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
57 KLYCZEK Andrew 1% 10% 26% 35% 22% 6%
58 BERNABE Rafael 1% 7% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
59 LYNCH Owen C. 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1% -
60 KAUNITZ Emmanuel - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
61 RNO Kyler 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
62 WERWA Griffith 9% 28% 35% 21% 6% 1%
63 WOOLLEY Blake M. - 2% 12% 32% 38% 16%
64 CHO Xzander 8% 30% 37% 19% 5% 1% -
65 HUTH Trevor - 3% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
66 LIM Lance Jeremiah 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
67 ARCE Andrew W. 13% 33% 34% 16% 4% - -
68 LEVY Jacob 6% 27% 39% 23% 5% -
69 WHITE Joshua H. 1% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2%
70 ARANA Massimo 8% 30% 38% 20% 4% -
71 CHEN Kelton 12% 37% 35% 14% 3% - -
72 CONVERSE Warren D. - 5% 19% 33% 28% 12% 2%
73 SEMP Iain - 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
74 HSIAO Nicholas 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
75 SHANNON Jack 38% 42% 17% 3% - - -
76 BHAN Amar 40% 42% 15% 3% - - -
77 DONDERIS AJ - 6% 23% 37% 26% 7%
78 SHEA William 64% 30% 6% 1% - -
79 TAM Kyle 52% 37% 10% 1% - - -
80 DRESSEL Jet 1% 5% 19% 34% 29% 11% 1%
81 ORLOV Dmitriy - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 8%
82 BELOKON Sammy 26% 44% 24% 6% 1% - -
83 ZAPPALA Nikolai 31% 43% 21% 4% - - -
84 IFORD Andrew W. 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
85 LAO Kevin 13% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -
86 SNIVELY Mark C. 1% 12% 32% 34% 16% 3% -
87 DAVIS Mitchell 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
88 GALLER Dave 21% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
89 MUNDAHL Brandon D. 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
90 MCCONVILLE Brendan M. 4% 19% 34% 28% 12% 3% -
91 CANADY Isaac 18% 42% 30% 9% 1% - -
92 KHER Roan < 1% 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 4%
93 MCKEE Calvin 81% 17% 1% - - - -
94 GUEVARRA Gabriel (Gabe) W. 6% 29% 38% 21% 5% 1% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.