Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 19% |
2 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
3 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
3 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
5 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
6 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
7 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
8 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
9 | STRAYER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
10 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
11 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
12 | TAN Christien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 24% |
13 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
14 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
15 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
16 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
17 | FINLEY Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
18 | TEMPLE Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | |
19 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
20 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 23% |
21 | WANG Rory | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
22 | JIANG Bowang | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
23 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
24 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
25 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
26 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | - | |
27 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
28 | HAMILTON Brock B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
29 | MEJIA MATTHEW D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 17% |
30 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
31 | KIM Andy | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
32 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
33 | CAPRA Ethan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
34 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
34 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
36 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
37 | XIE Buster | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
38 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
39 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | |
40 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | KIM Brian | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
42 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 41% | 11% |
43 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
44 | LI Allen | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
45 | TANG xianchi | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
46 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
47 | GE Daniel | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
48 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
49 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 8% | |
50 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% | |
51 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
52 | ROUNTREE Rob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
53 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
54 | FENG Michael | 100% | 94% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
56 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% | |
57 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | |
58 | BERNABE Rafael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
59 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
60 | KAUNITZ Emmanuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
61 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
62 | WERWA Griffith | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
63 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% | |
64 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
65 | HUTH Trevor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
66 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
67 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
68 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | |
69 | WHITE Joshua H. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
70 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
71 | CHEN Kelton | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
72 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
73 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
74 | HSIAO Nicholas | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
75 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
76 | BHAN Amar | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
77 | DONDERIS AJ | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | |
78 | SHEA William | 100% | 36% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
79 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
81 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
82 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 74% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
83 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
84 | IFORD Andrew W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
85 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
86 | SNIVELY Mark C. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
87 | DAVIS Mitchell | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
88 | GALLER Dave | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
89 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
90 | MCCONVILLE Brendan M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
91 | CANADY Isaac | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
92 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 4% |
93 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
94 | GUEVARRA Gabriel (Gabe) W. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.