Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 7% |
| 2 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 3 | AMRANI David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
| 3 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 6 | GREENLEAF Paul | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 7 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 8 | CHUA Kirby | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 9% | |
| 9 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% |
| 10 | WOHLERS Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 11 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
| 12 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 13 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | ABANILLA Luke | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 15 | BISHOP Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 16 | RIPA Joseph K. | 100% | 98% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | DENG Kenny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 18 | VO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 19 | LIGH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 19% | |
| 20 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 21 | GE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 9% | |
| 22 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 24 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 25 | YEE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 12% | |
| 25 | GARDOS Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 27 | TRINH Tan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 28 | CUTLER Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% | |
| 29 | SULLIVAN Redmond | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | KONDOR James | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | SAMMATARO Corey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | WILSON Samuel S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
| 33 | HARRIS Noah | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 34 | JEFF Ariff | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% |
| 35 | PETINO Leonardo | 100% | 95% | 66% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | LIGH Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 38 | DEROSA Patrick | 100% | 78% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | WEINTROUB Ezra | 100% | 92% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 41 | XU Brian | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | HO Jor Sam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 43 | MCENTEE Owen | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | SFINTESCU Alex | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | HOWARD Fox | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 46 | SUBBIAH Sidharth | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HORAN Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 48 | ROWAN Danny | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | REN Leo B. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 50 | MARSHALL Henry | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LAI Aaron | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 97% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WALSH Frederic | 100% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | DANGELO Connor | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | ANDERSON Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 57 | KAPLOWITZ Eric | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ Alex | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.