DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 2 | MUNLIN Donovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | |
| 3 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 12% |
| 3 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 5 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 28% |
| 6 | MURPHY Thomas P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 7 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 8 | SINGH Aryaman | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 1% |
| 10 | DOYON - VERDON William | 100% | 96% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 11 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 12 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 14 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 15 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 16 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | DOAN Joseph M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 6% |
| 19 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | BROWN Joshua (Josh) A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
| 22 | KING Cameron | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 23 | HITCHCOCK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 24 | LEWIS Paul D. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | HERZ Alexander S. | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 7% | |
| 27 | ALI Farhan | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
| 29 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 84% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | CHRISTY Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 31 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 54% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 64% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 34 | AMOLSCH Dylan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 96% | 68% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 36 | PENG Yue | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 61% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 78% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | CORRIDON Jack T. | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 40 | BABCOCK Alana | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.