The Ocean Center Convention Center - Daytona Beach, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CLICK Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% |
2 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
3 | IRWIN Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% |
3 | SPIER Julian H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
5 | DENIZE Paul Edmond Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
6 | DAVIS Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 23% |
7 | SIMMES Jackson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
8 | VACCARO Dominick J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 9% | - |
9 | CARTY JR Johndale | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
10 | MOORE Jeremy S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 57% |
11 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
12 | GOLDSON Tyrese | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
13 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
14 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
15 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
16 | CHUNG Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
17 | HANDBERG Paul | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
18 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 12% |
19 | HERNANDEZ SANTIAGO | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
20 | MIZRAHI Michael | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
21 | NUDELMAN Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
22 | LEWIS Jared | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 15% |
23 | EMDEN André | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
24 | KYPRAIOS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
25 | SARIKONDA Akhil | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
26 | CREMONA Diego Maria | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
27 | DAVIS Jonah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
28 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
29 | WALLACE James | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
30 | LEADBETTER Gordon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
31 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
33 | NALLAMSHETTY Ayan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - |
34 | VILLAFANE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
35 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
36 | DE LA CRUZ Justin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
37 | GROSSE Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 4% |
38 | MONTALVO Jose J. | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | RODDENBERRY Steven | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
40 | ARTHUR Gregory M. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
41 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
42 | MARTINEZ Gabriel | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
43 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
44 | MARTINEZ Kenneth | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
45 | GUO Lucas | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
47 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
48 | CHEKH Vladimir | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | - |
49 | SHILOV Maxim | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
50 | MCFARLAND John G. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
51 | PATEL Jayen | 100% | 93% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
52 | MALIKOV Zinnun | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
53 | MARSI Mattia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
54 | SRAMBIKKAL Pranav | 100% | 96% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | LIU Nick | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
55 | VENZON Gavin | 100% | 77% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.