Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% | |
| 2 | SHA Michael | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 3 | TREBON Hayden | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 68% | |
| 3 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% | |
| 5 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 55% |
| 6 | TRULL A.J. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 7 | WANG Justin | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 9% | |
| 8 | CAUCHY Eliot | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 9 | XIE Brandon | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 10 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 33% | 3% | |
| 11 | JIANG Ryan | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 12 | JIANG Matthew | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 13 | ZHANG Dinghao | - | 2% | 19% | 50% | 26% | 3% | |
| 14 | LAI Boden | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% | |
| 15 | SHONEMAN Sam | - | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | ZHANG Roland | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 17 | HU Lucas | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
| 18 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 1% | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 43% | 16% | |
| 20 | BAJAJ Nakul | 1% | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 21 | SONG Troy | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | LIU Adam | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
| 23 | BRADSHAW Carter | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | SINGH Jaysukh | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 25 | MEN Junda | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 26 | HU Anton | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% | |
| 27 | LIN Zizhen | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | GOON Tristan Yang | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 6% | |
| 29 | WONG Maximus | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 30 | WONG King-Yee | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% | |
| 31 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 32 | PAN Anthony | 2% | 20% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% | |
| 34 | SANTOS Antonio K. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 35 | YU Samuel | 2% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | NUTOVYCH David | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 45% | 9% | |
| 38 | WANG Xiangdong | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ZHAO Zidong | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 41 | WOLFORD Benjamin | 28% | 51% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | YAO Jack | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 45 | MASSE Jack | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 46 | TESFAYE Elias | 15% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | XIA Dashan | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | XU Che | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 49 | SCHAUER Oliver | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | HELMY Richard | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | SINGLETON Aman | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 52 | WANG HANZHANG | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 53 | GAO Andrew | 28% | 50% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 54 | WU Chi Kuan | 39% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | SPRINGER Elijah | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | GLUSHKOV David | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 57 | SONG Changze | 30% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 58 | YIN Chujun | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 59 | FEINBERG James Y. | 21% | 46% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | KELLEY Hayden | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 61 | AHMED Mohsen | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | MECHREFE Anthony | 40% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 63 | WHITE Aidan | 42% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 64 | KANG Eunchan | 7% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 66 | ZHOU Anping | 15% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 67 | MASSE Dean | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.