Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% |
| 2 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
| 3 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 3 | BING Charles | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 35% |
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
| 6 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 1% | 15% | 49% | 36% | ||
| 7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 51% | 25% |
| 8 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | - | - | 3% | 21% | 47% | 30% | |
| 9 | CHENG Ethan | 5% | 28% | 44% | 19% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 10 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 11 | LIN Michael | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 13% |
| 12 | LI Matthew | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 23% | |
| 13 | PO Oliver | - | 1% | 17% | 50% | 32% | ||
| 14 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 15 | JIANG Owen | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 16 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | 9% | 49% | 35% | 7% | ||
| 17 | LI Eric | - | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 27% | |
| 18 | LI Arvin | - | - | 3% | 22% | 44% | 28% | 3% |
| 19 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 20 | LI Ayren | - | 8% | 35% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SHIN Joshua J. | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 24% | |
| 22 | HE Xiangrui | - | - | 1% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% |
| 23 | SHAO Eric | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
| 24 | YOON DYLAN | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 25 | LI Aaron | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | - | 1% | 14% | 42% | 33% | 9% | - |
| 27 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 49% | 26% | 4% |
| 28 | YAO Bradley | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | KONG Luculentus X. | 1% | 12% | 48% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG Rory | 7% | 33% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | RNO Kyler | 15% | 45% | 33% | 7% | - | - | |
| 32 | GONG Benjamin | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 33 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 34 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 31% | 3% |
| 35 | TANG Terry | 1% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | WANG Mason | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 37 | LIU Derek | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 37% | 10% | |
| 38 | FENG Michael | 12% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | YANG Dylan | 2% | 38% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LU Howen | 2% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 41 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 7% | 38% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | TIBBETTS Justin | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | LAO Kevin | 39% | 52% | 9% | - | - | ||
| 45 | XU Ethan | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | SURESH Rohan | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | SOLOPOULOS James | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | TJON Calum | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | HOLLIS Sean | 11% | 45% | 38% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SUN Ryan | 1% | 22% | 47% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | STAFFORD Gareth | 56% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Brandon | 47% | 47% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 53 | GARDINER Luke J. | 45% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | HAZLETT Grady | 58% | 36% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BAI Brian | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 27% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | BHAN Amar | 26% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | BRATTAIN Trey | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.