Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
| 2 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 3 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% |
| 3 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% |
| 5 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 34% | |
| 6 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 36% | ||
| 7 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 25% |
| 8 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 30% | |
| 9 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 66% | 23% | 3% | < 1% | |
| 10 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% |
| 12 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 23% | |
| 13 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 32% | ||
| 14 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 15 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 16 | MILLER Aidan A. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 41% | 7% | ||
| 17 | LI Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | |
| 18 | LI Arvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 30% | 3% |
| 19 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 20 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 91% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 21 | SHIN Joshua J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 24% | |
| 22 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 9% |
| 23 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 24 | YOON DYLAN | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 6% | |
| 25 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 9% | - |
| 27 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 30% | 4% |
| 28 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | KONG Luculentus X. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WANG Rory | 100% | 93% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | RNO Kyler | 100% | 85% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | GONG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 33 | DAVIDSON Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 34 | SIMA Congyu Josh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 34% | 3% |
| 35 | TANG Terry | 100% | 99% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 36 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 37 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 10% | |
| 38 | FENG Michael | 100% | 88% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 98% | 59% | 16% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | LU Howen | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 95% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 100% | 93% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | TIBBETTS Justin | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | LAO Kevin | 100% | 61% | 9% | - | - | ||
| 45 | XU Ethan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 46 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | SOLOPOULOS James | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | TJON Calum | 100% | 93% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 89% | 45% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 50 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 99% | 77% | 30% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 44% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 53% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 53 | GARDINER Luke J. | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | HAZLETT Grady | 100% | 42% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BAI Brian | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 57 | BHAN Amar | 100% | 74% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | BRATTAIN Trey | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.