Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 2 | LEE Olivia | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 3 | SYKES Elynor | - | - | 6% | 27% | 44% | 24% | |
| 3 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 5 | BEZUGLAYA Varvara | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 6 | CHEN Jingyun | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 4% |
| 7 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% | |
| 8 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 9 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
| 10 | FAN Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 11 | ZOU ZIXI | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 12 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 13 | YAO Yilin | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 14 | CHA Eugenie | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% |
| 15 | SUN MANRONG | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | BARBARA Camille | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | |
| 17 | LEE Camilla | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% |
| 18 | GUO Luxi | - | - | 3% | 24% | 50% | 23% | |
| 19 | DRYSDALE Lita | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 20 | PHUKAN Indra | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 21 | BUSH emma | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 30% |
| 22 | DUONG Zoey | - | 5% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 23 | WANG Angelina | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 38% | 11% | |
| 24 | OLORVIDA Isabella | 1% | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | KIM Jayna | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 27 | HSIU Elizabeth | - | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 3% |
| 28 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
| 30 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
| 31 | DALEY Keira | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 32 | HAU Olivia | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 33 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 34 | LAI Amanda | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 35 | DAYAL Saahira | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | HASIM Eurietta | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 37 | WANG Victoria | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 38 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | LEE Samantha X. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 39 | WANG Jessie | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 41 | LIU Baihan | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 42 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 8% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 43 | CHANG Celine A. | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 17% | |
| 44 | LIANG Jingjing | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | |
| 45 | XU Celina | - | 8% | 45% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | GULLY Wren | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - |
| 47 | PYE Emily | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 4% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | CHANG chaehee | 6% | 68% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | ENRILE Erica | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 3% | |
| 52 | SCANLAN Claire | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
| 54 | KAUSHISH Sara | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 55 | ZHUANG Lauren | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 56 | LIN Isabel | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 57 | LEE Yeriel | 1% | 13% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 58 | UM KIM Hyun Hee Lorena | 18% | 56% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 59 | CHEN Samantha | 46% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | GAN Shelby | 28% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 61 | MOLLINIER Angel | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | BROWN Riley | - | 2% | 27% | 48% | 20% | 2% | |
| 63 | JAMES Ashley | 5% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 64 | COHEN Shaina | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | PATTERSON Liliya | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | CHANG Abigail | 8% | 32% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 66 | MOORADIAN Anya | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 68 | BLANCO Ariia | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 24% | 45% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | ZHANG Rose | 60% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | LI Yunxuan (Joy) | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 72 | LEE Valerie | 16% | 52% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 73 | BENNETT Vienne | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 74 | SALAZAR Emma | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 75 | TSUI Zoe | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 76 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - | |
| 77 | CHENG Liwen | 65% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | PADHI Nisha | 43% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 79 | CHENG Yiwen | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.