Fortune Fencing RYC/RJCC/ROC(D1A, DV2, VET) & Y8

Y-14 Men's Foil

Sunday, September 3, 2023 at 4:00 PM

Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 NGUYEN Martin - - - - 3% 25% 72%
2 YI William - - - < 1% 7% 37% 56%
3 LO Preston - - - 3% 18% 45% 34%
3 MORROW Brenden - - - 1% 12% 49% 38%
5 CHOI Ethan - - - 1% 12% 49% 38%
6 LE Jacob H. - - 1% 9% 29% 40% 21%
7 ZHANG Jacob - - 1% 6% 25% 45% 23%
8 KIM Daniel Y. - - - 3% 18% 45% 34%
9 CHOI Ethan - - 1% 8% 33% 45% 13%
10 PARK Rion - - - 2% 11% 37% 50%
11 CHANG Jonathan - - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
12 BAE Eugene - 1% 6% 20% 36% 29% 8%
13 ZHANG Aaron - - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
14 ZHONG Maxwell - 1% 6% 25% 44% 22% 3%
15 LING Carson Jr 3% 16% 32% 32% 15% 3%
16 RAUTUREAU Arthur - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
17 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - 1% 7% 28% 45% 19%
18 KAWADA Sebastien - - - 1% 10% 43% 46%
19 UPENDER West - 5% 22% 38% 27% 7% 1%
20 ZHOU Ryan - 1% 7% 23% 36% 26% 7%
21 TSAY Jordan R. - - - 3% 21% 51% 25%
22 PETROV Mikhail 6% 23% 35% 25% 9% 1% -
23 TULYAG Azim - 4% 16% 33% 33% 13%
24 NGAI Julian - - 4% 20% 41% 30% 4%
25 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. - - 1% 14% 56% 25% 3%
26 KAUSHISH Rayirth - 3% 16% 37% 34% 9% 1%
27 BORG Matthew - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
28 GORDON William L. - - 5% 20% 37% 30% 9%
29 CHANG Jeremy - 3% 14% 33% 35% 13% 2%
30 CHUN Dashel 1% 9% 25% 35% 24% 6%
31 CHEN Matthew - 1% 6% 24% 41% 24% 4%
32 DENG David - 3% 13% 29% 34% 18% 3%
33 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - - 1% 8% 27% 41% 23%
34 LI Toby - - 1% 8% 30% 43% 18%
35 CHANG Eric Jonathan - 3% 14% 32% 33% 15% 2%
36 YANG Charles - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
37 SISINNI Leonardo - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
38 PARK William - 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
39 YU ShiLin (Harry) 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 8% 1%
40 YUE Jackson 1% 7% 24% 35% 24% 8% 1%
41 CHEN Jason 1% 14% 39% 33% 11% 1% -
42 ANDRADE Cedric 15% 38% 34% 12% 2% - -
43 YU ShiYu (Henry) - 3% 13% 30% 34% 18% 3%
44 BRADY Benjamin 1% 9% 30% 40% 18% 3% -
45 LIANG Ethan 31% 43% 21% 5% 1% - -
46 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - 1% 4% 18% 37% 31% 9%
47 MANIKTALA Suvir 3% 16% 32% 31% 14% 3% -
47 HUANG Nathan 7% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
49 LI Daniel 7% 30% 42% 19% 2% - -
50 HONG Edwin 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
51 TSOI Spencer 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
52 PARK David 1% 9% 29% 38% 18% 3% -
53 JACOB Ezra 3% 19% 38% 30% 9% 1% -
54 ZHAN Kevin 3% 19% 36% 30% 11% 1% -
55 HE Ian 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1% -
56 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 7% 39% 37% 14% 2% - -
57 WONG Braxton 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
58 ZHANG Jayden 5% 21% 34% 27% 10% 2% -
59 PONTOPPIDAN Erik 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
60 NISHIHIRA Tyler 10% 30% 34% 19% 5% 1%
61 TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin 6% 23% 35% 26% 9% 1%
62 PARK Roy 9% 30% 35% 20% 5% 1% -
63 DULAI Angad 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% 1% -
64 DACKO Nolan 10% 32% 35% 18% 4% - -
65 HE Bourne 5% 25% 39% 24% 6% 1% -
66 FOY Grant 13% 33% 33% 17% 4% - -
67 LEE Mason 6% 26% 38% 22% 6% 1% -
68 ZHANG Yankai 2% 14% 30% 32% 18% 5% -
69 WANG sicheng - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
70 DULAI Agam 5% 26% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
71 YANG Aaron 10% 34% 38% 16% 2% - -
72 TOYOFUKU Lucas 16% 41% 33% 9% 1% - -
73 SHEN Alaric 6% 28% 39% 22% 5% - -
74 MAO Runxian 9% 32% 38% 17% 3% - -
75 VAQUILAR Felix L. 18% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
76 YUNG Brandon 40% 42% 16% 3% - - -
77 TURNER Finian 3% 17% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
78 OH Kepler 25% 44% 25% 5% - - -
79 ARCARA Evan 14% 39% 35% 11% 1% - -
79 MITCHELL Max 4% 22% 42% 29% 3% - -
81 GUO Austin 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% - -
82 OLLILA Gideon - 2% 14% 36% 35% 12% 1%
83 LEE Christopher 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
84 TRAN Matthew 7% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1% -
85 OZCAN Archer 68% 28% 4% - - - -
86 KWONG Colin 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
86 TRUJILLO Jonah 23% 43% 26% 7% 1% - -
88 BEIGEL Leia 1% 9% 27% 35% 22% 6% -
89 HUANG Terrance 24% 44% 26% 5% - - -
90 HOLINER Dmitri 6% 24% 34% 25% 9% 2% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.