Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 56% |
| 3 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 3 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 38% |
| 5 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 38% |
| 6 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 7 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 23% |
| 8 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% |
| 9 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 13% |
| 10 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 11 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 12 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 8% |
| 13 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 14 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% | 3% |
| 15 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
| 16 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 17 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 19% |
| 18 | KAWADA Sebastien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 46% |
| 19 | UPENDER West | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 21 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% |
| 22 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 23 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | |
| 24 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 4% |
| 25 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 28% | 3% |
| 26 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 27 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
| 28 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 29 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 2% |
| 30 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 31 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 4% |
| 32 | DENG David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 33 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 34 | LI Toby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 18% |
| 35 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 2% |
| 36 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 37 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 38 | PARK William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | CHEN Jason | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 42 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
| 44 | BRADY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 47 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 47 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LI Daniel | 100% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 52 | PARK David | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 53 | JACOB Ezra | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 55 | HE Ian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | GUDIMETLA Siddhanth | 100% | 93% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 58 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 61 | TSUI Raedyn Ho Hin | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 62 | PARK Roy | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 63 | DULAI Angad | 100% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | HE Bourne | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 66 | FOY Grant | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 67 | LEE Mason | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 68 | ZHANG Yankai | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 69 | WANG sicheng | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 70 | DULAI Agam | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 71 | YANG Aaron | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 100% | 84% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 73 | SHEN Alaric | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 74 | MAO Runxian | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 75 | VAQUILAR Felix L. | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | YUNG Brandon | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 77 | TURNER Finian | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 78 | OH Kepler | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 79 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 86% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 79 | MITCHELL Max | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | GUO Austin | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 82 | OLLILA Gideon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 83 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | TRAN Matthew | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 85 | OZCAN Archer | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 86 | KWONG Colin | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 86 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | BEIGEL Leia | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 89 | HUANG Terrance | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 90 | HOLINER Dmitri | 100% | 94% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.