Greater Philadelphia Expo Center - Oaks, PA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Jonathan | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
2 | LAI Boden | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 40% | 12% | |
3 | SVERDLOV Seth | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
3 | ZHANG ethan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
5 | FISHMAN Rahm | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
6 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 19% |
7 | ARAVIND Athreya | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
8 | WONG King-Yee | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - |
9 | HU Robert J. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% |
10 | CAO Albert | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% | |
11 | HEADRICK Lance | - | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | |
12 | CHEN Leonardo | - | 4% | 26% | 45% | 22% | 3% | |
13 | PARK Nicholas | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
14 | THAKUR Om S. | - | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% |
15 | KARIMOV Amir | 12% | 39% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
16 | RIM Eugene | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
17 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 6% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
18 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
19 | KRISHNAN Skanda | 1% | 7% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
20 | HEADRICK Jack | - | 11% | 42% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
21 | LAPP Oliver | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
22 | SHA Michael | - | - | 5% | 27% | 47% | 21% | |
23 | LI Jade | 37% | 44% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
24 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 37% | 6% |
25 | VODOVOZOV Denis | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
26 | MCWILLIAMS Miles | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
27 | GANESAN Mathavan | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | |
28 | OKUN Benjamin | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
29 | ANAFI Ari | 3% | 55% | 34% | 7% | - | - | |
30 | ZHANG Roland | 3% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 6% | - | |
31 | JOEL Irenov | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
32 | VANSTONE Trucker | 3% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | YU Samuel | 9% | 36% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - | |
34 | LEE Wyatt | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
35 | ALAM Rajan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
36 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 44% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
37 | SUN Ethan | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
38 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
39 | LEE Benjamin | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
40 | KUKAFKA Max | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | CUMMINGS Owen | 92% | 8% | - | - | - | - | |
42 | CZEPLA Andrew | 6% | 30% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
43 | CASE Ciaran | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
44 | PATHAK Arush | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
45 | SMITH Connor | 4% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.