La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAO Aretha R. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 3 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 3 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 5 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% |
| 6 | TIKHONOVA Julia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 7 | KWON Athina | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 8 | BROOKS Tean R. | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 9 | BEI Karen | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 10 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 11 | SMIK Leonie A. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 11 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 13 | LAN Alice S. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 14 | ZMURK Emma M. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 18% | |
| 15 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | WILEY Erica | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% | |
| 19 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 20 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 21 | WOLF Isabella A. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 4% |
| 22 | HARRISON Amelia H. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 23 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | DINGMAN Amanda | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | MARSH Janet L. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 26 | BRILL Sophie | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 27 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 28 | SOIN Anika A. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SIKDAR Ishani | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | ERTAS Eileen | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | GERARDIN Marie | 7% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SINHA Zara | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | CHIEM Karen | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 34 | RUSSELL Renata | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 35 | KWON Tiara | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | QURESHI Aafreen | - | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 37 | DANIEL Olivia | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% | |
| 39 | MOHABIR Ariane | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 40 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Nora | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 42 | COBLE Avery L. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 43 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | HAWKINS Laura A. | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | BARON Sabina | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZHOU Emily | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | FILIPPOV NEMETH Victoria | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 48 | DUNBAR Breck L. | 3% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 2% | |
| 49 | HEPLER Sarah | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | LAU Brynn Mackenzie | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | JIANG Corina | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 52 | ZHANG mickey | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 53 | RUSSELL Alison | 3% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | RICH Caroline B. | 3% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEE Tsz Ying | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | PARKER Jacquie D. | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 58 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.