La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAO Aretha R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 2 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 3 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 3 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 5 | BEIHOLD Emily M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
| 6 | TIKHONOVA Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% |
| 7 | KWON Athina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 8% |
| 8 | BROOKS Tean R. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 9 | BEI Karen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 13% | |
| 10 | BEITTEL Chloe F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% | |
| 11 | SMIK Leonie A. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 11 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 13 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 14 | ZMURK Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | |
| 15 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 16 | WILEY Erica | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 17 | YEU Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 18 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 19 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 20 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | WOLF Isabella A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 4% |
| 22 | HARRISON Amelia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 23 | FILIPPOV Nika D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | DINGMAN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | MARSH Janet L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 26 | BRILL Sophie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
| 27 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 28 | SOIN Anika A. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SIKDAR Ishani | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | ERTAS Eileen | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | GERARDIN Marie | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | SINHA Zara | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 33 | CHIEM Karen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 34 | RUSSELL Renata | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | KWON Tiara | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | QURESHI Aafreen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 37 | DANIEL Olivia | 100% | 98% | 78% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | SHAMSIAN Shaya | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
| 39 | MOHABIR Ariane | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 40 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | WANG Nora | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | |
| 42 | COBLE Avery L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
| 43 | PRIMES Amanda M. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 44 | HAWKINS Laura A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | BARON Sabina | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | ZHOU Emily | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 47 | FILIPPOV NEMETH Victoria | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 48 | DUNBAR Breck L. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | |
| 49 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 50 | LAU Brynn Mackenzie | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | JIANG Corina | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 52 | ZHANG mickey | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | RUSSELL Alison | 100% | 97% | 67% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | RICH Caroline B. | 100% | 97% | 69% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LEE Tsz Ying | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHIMIENTI Michele | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 57 | PARKER Jacquie D. | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 58 | GNANASEKAT Arti | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.