Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | EMARA Omar | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 2 | ELLISON Harper F. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 3 | NORBUTAS Jackson S. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 3 | MCCOWN Ronan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 5 | CHRISTENSEN Parker | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 6 | CHA Russell W. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 7 | CUMMINGS Atticus C. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 8 | ZAYDMAN David M. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 9 | LI Patrick | V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 10 | MILLER Jeffrey E. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 11 | STRAUSS Luke | V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V V D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | GASPAROVICH IV George M. | D V V D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 4 | -1.4 |
| 14 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | V D V V D | V V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 15 | KIM William M. | D V V V D D | V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 16 | GAO Zachary | D D D D D V | V V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 17 | LONGSHORE IZEYAH T. | V V V D V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 18 | FOWLER James A. | D V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 19 | LEE Jayden J. | V D V V V V | D | 1.9 | 5 | +3.1 |
| 20 | WESTPHAL David R. | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | SINHA Zaan | V V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | LEE JoonWon | D V V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 23 | YU Austin | V V D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 24 | STENCEL Andrew E. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 25 | MCADOO Declan | D D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 26 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | D D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 26 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 28 | DANIS Blake M. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 29 | KENT V David | V D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 30 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | D V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 31 | SCHIEK Harrison | D D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 32 | SPITLER Ansel | D D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 33 | MERRIAM Isaiah G. | V V D V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 34 | WU Alistair | V D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 35 | HEADRICK Lance | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 36 | PETERSON Matthew | V V V D D D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 37 | PADHYE Siddhant | D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 38 | DANIELS Jonah | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 39 | CUMMINGS Kai | D D V D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 40 | HEADRICK Jack | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 41 | ZHOU Austin | V D D D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 41 | CHOI San | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 43 | PINON Jeremiah | D V D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 44 | WONG Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 45 | LEE DoWon | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 46 | MILEY Walker | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 47 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | D D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 48 | LOMIO Nicholas A. | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 49 | HAALAND Josef | D D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | MALLON Jaxson | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 51 | SHULL Marc | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 52 | ANDERSON Donald | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 53 | HERRON Jonathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 54 | FREGGER Alex | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.