Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
| 2 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
| 3 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 3 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 5 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 6 | TU Jinqi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 7 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 8 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
| 9 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 10 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 20% | 4% |
| 11 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 12 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | YANG Gary | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 15 | SHCHUR Grayson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | IPPOLITO-JOHN Matteo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 17 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 18 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 19 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% | |
| 20 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | |
| 21 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 22 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 23 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | HERDMAN Julian | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 26 | KANG Eunchan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 27 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 28 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 29 | NAM Nathaniel | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 30 | LIANG Yi-po(Ryder) | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 31 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 35 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 100% | 89% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 36 | LEE Anton | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 39 | OCONNOR Paul | 100% | 74% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 45 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 46 | LIN ZIJIE | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 47 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 48 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 48 | WU Matthew | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | VICK Ethan | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | VANWESENBEECK Doga Isak | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | YIN Justin | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 54 | HAN Keyi | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.