Hackensack, NJ - Hackensack, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VANNI Filippo A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 32% |
| 2 | HERGERT Benito | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 3 | BAE Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 3 | SCHULTES Evans | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 22% |
| 5 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 6 | KWON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 7 | BOISLARD Adam J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 8 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 9 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 10 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 10 | SCHENCK Koen M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
| 12 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 13 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 7% |
| 13 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 15 | LE Vyn A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
| 16 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 18 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 19 | BELLUOMO David C. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 20 | CHOI-SLATTERY Kieran M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | WANG Gerald Y. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 22 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 6% |
| 23 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 24 | HAN Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 25 | KIZHNER Fillip | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 26 | BREIER Matthew F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
| 27 | BURKE Jared | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | ENGEL Henry R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 29 | GALLUCCI Charles John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
| 30 | MAYER Richard | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 31 | WEI William | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 32 | DAUM Charlie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 33 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 34 | FU Yifan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 5% | |
| 35 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | HOWARD Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | ZHAO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 39 | GUO Sean | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 40 | PATRICK Edward L. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 41 | FINN Mark T. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TALLARICO Matthew | 100% | 98% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 43 | TRUBETSKI David | 100% | 94% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | NITTEL Jake | 100% | 94% | 73% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | LI Richard | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 46 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 47 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 48 | LIN Joseph | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | ECK Nathaniel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 50 | ARANA Massimo | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | CRANS Benjamin | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | AMRANI David | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | JUSTUS Benjamin | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEUNG Kevin | 100% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | MARRINAN Aidan | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.