Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MATSAKH Philip | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 2 | KLOTZ Isaiah | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 3 | ZHOU Leon | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
| 3 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 20% |
| 5 | MILLER Jordan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 16% |
| 6 | FENG Michael | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | |
| 7 | LI Bradley | - | - | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 22% |
| 8 | MARTIN Darius | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 9 | CHENG Logan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 14% | ||
| 10 | CHEN Hanson | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 11 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 12 | BLEIL Tyler | 7% | 26% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 13 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
| 14 | SHAPIRO Leon | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 15 | ARCE Andrew W. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | SURESH Rohan | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 17 | MILLER Dillon | - | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 13% |
| 19 | CHEN Kyle P. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% | |
| 20 | BAI Brian | 4% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 3% | ||
| 21 | WANG Brian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% |
| 22 | LEE Eugene | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 23 | CHO Xzander | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
| 25 | MUNDY Ezra | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 26 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | - | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 28 | SHANNON Jack | - | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 29 | NICOLL William | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 30 | LI Ayren | - | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | ||
| 31 | HAN Alexander | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | JURMAN Therin | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 33 | TOOMRE Kai | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 34 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 14% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 36 | REN Ryan | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | VO Aidan | 12% | 41% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SIMON Luke | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 39 | YANG Dylan | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | HOU Gaven | - | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ONIK Ari N. | 1% | 9% | 34% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | TAM Kyle | 2% | 15% | 42% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | TANG Alex | 1% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 44 | GERRISH William | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | ||
| 45 | SION Andrew | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 46 | LIANG Haojia | 46% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | LIM Charles | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 48 | WEISS Zachary | 48% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 49 | XU Brian | 5% | 62% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 50 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | GECKELER James | 5% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | PARK Ethan | 18% | 49% | 27% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 54 | KRZYWON Dylan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | ||
| 55 | WOODCOCK Henry | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 56 | DHANOA Kian | 23% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | BO Aiden | 78% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | CHUN Zachary | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | CHUN Alexander | 89% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.