Chelsea Piers - Stamford, CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | MATSAKH Philip | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
2 | KLOTZ Isaiah | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
3 | ZHOU Leon | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
3 | GHEDINI Luca | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
5 | MILLER Jordan | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
6 | FENG Michael | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
7 | LI Bradley | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
8 | MARTIN Darius | V V D D V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
9 | CHENG Logan | V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
10 | CHEN Hanson | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
11 | CHEN Ethan | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
12 | BLEIL Tyler | V D V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
13 | AKYAMAC Bora | V V D V V D | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
14 | SHAPIRO Leon | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | ARCE Andrew W. | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
16 | SURESH Rohan | V V D D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
17 | MILLER Dillon | V V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
18 | KAPOOR Aayan | V V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
19 | CHEN Kyle P. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
20 | BAI Brian | D V V V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
21 | WANG Brian | V D V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
22 | LEE Eugene | D V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
23 | CHO Xzander | V V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
24 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
25 | MUNDY Ezra | V V D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
26 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | V D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
27 | SIMONOV Timofey | D D V V D V | V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
28 | SHANNON Jack | D V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
29 | NICOLL William | D D D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
30 | LI Ayren | D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
31 | HAN Alexander | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
32 | JURMAN Therin | D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
33 | TOOMRE Kai | V D V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
34 | PERLMAN Taiyo | D D V V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
35 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | D D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
36 | REN Ryan | V V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
37 | VO Aidan | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
38 | SIMON Luke | V V D D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
39 | YANG Dylan | V D D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
40 | HOU Gaven | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
41 | ONIK Ari N. | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
42 | TAM Kyle | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
43 | TANG Alex | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | GERRISH William | V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
45 | SION Andrew | D D D V D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
46 | LIANG Haojia | D V D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
47 | LIM Charles | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
48 | WEISS Zachary | D D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
49 | XU Brian | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
50 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
51 | ABRAMKIN Tim | V D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
52 | GECKELER James | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
53 | PARK Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
54 | KRZYWON Dylan | D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
55 | WOODCOCK Henry | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
56 | DHANOA Kian | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
57 | BO Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
58 | CHUN Zachary | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
59 | CHUN Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.