SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SIYANKO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 2 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 3 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
| 3 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 8% | |
| 5 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 44% |
| 6 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 7 | ARICO Trey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 21% |
| 8 | FENG shang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | NAKAS Levent | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 28% |
| 9 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | 6% |
| 11 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 7% | < 1% |
| 12 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
| 13 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 14 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 6% |
| 14 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 25% |
| 16 | LAPP Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 6% |
| 17 | DURKIN Tristan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 18 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
| 20 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
| 21 | LAM Alan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% | |
| 22 | WU Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | MEN Junda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 5% |
| 24 | LENNON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 25 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 27 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | |
| 28 | ZHAO kuncheng | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 7% | |
| 29 | YU Samuel | 100% | 99% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 31 | LI Morgan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | ATKINS Levi H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
| 33 | DURKIN Brian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 35 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 36 | LI Jade | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 37 | JIANG ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
| 38 | ALABI Tobi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 39 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 91% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | AGUIRRE Diego | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 43 | CAO Ray | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 44 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 46 | ANAFI Ari | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 47 | JOEL Irenov | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | SCHAUER Oliver | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KANG Eunchan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | 1% |
| 50 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 51 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 53 | PATHAK Arush | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 54 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 55 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | SUN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 57 | WOOD Emmett | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | GANESAN Mathavan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
| 61 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | OKUN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 63 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 34% |
| 64 | LEE Wyatt | 100% | 97% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 65 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 67 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 100% | 100% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 68 | DEGENHARDT Zenji | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 69 | LIN Zizhen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 70 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 71 | WHEELER Jackson | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 72 | COLÓN Atum | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 74 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 75 | LEE Henry | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 76 | KAPLAN Maddox | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 77 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 78 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | SHIRKHEDKAR Tanuj | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Samuel | 100% | 97% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 81 | TSANG Aiden | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 82 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 83 | BARATY Teagan | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 84 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 85 | URBAN Leo | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | VANSTONE Trucker | 100% | 62% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | GUNNA Vishwaksai | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.