Fort Worth Convention Center - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | ZHENG Andy | V V V V V V | V V V V V V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
2 | HU Lucas | D V D V V | V V V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
3 | BRADSHAW Carter | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
3 | SHAN Junzhe | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
5 | MAO Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
6 | XIA Dashan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
7 | RUBIN Daniel | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
8 | LAM Alan | V D D V V D | V V V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
9 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
10 | KIM Jayden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
11 | LEE Aiden | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
12 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | V V D V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
13 | YUE Hongrui | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
14 | CHUNG Ethan Sheng Xuan | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
15 | JAIN Samyak | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
16 | LIU Josh | D V V V D | V V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
17 | LAI Boden | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
18 | HAMZA Tudor | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
19 | DECKER Hunter | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
20 | HUANG Kenneth | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
21 | WANG Joey | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
22 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | V V V D V V | V V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
23 | TAI Edison | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
24 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
25 | FRANGER Max | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
26 | ERLIKHMAN Adrian | V V V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
27 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
28 | BUI Henry | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
29 | LU Jacob | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
30 | GRAVES Lawson | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
31 | PARKER Isaiah | V V D V D | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
32 | KIM Joshua | D V D V D D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
33 | CHOI Zachary | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
34 | MEHROTRA Neel | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
35 | ZIEGLER John | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
36 | TRULL A.J. | V V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
37 | BORISENKO Samuel | V V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
38 | LEE DoWon | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
39 | SINGH Ravin | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
40 | MILEY Walker | V D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
41 | LEE Damien | V D D V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
42 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | V V D V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
43 | DOUBOV Andrew | V D V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
44 | SOOS Whitman | V V D V D V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
45 | KIM Alexander | D V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
46 | RODOCANACHI Hector | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
47 | ZENG Andrew | V V V D V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
48 | LI Tristan | D V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
48 | DONG Haiyi | V V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
50 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V V D D V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
51 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | V D V D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
52 | MITEV Alexander | D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
53 | HE Kaixuan | D D V D V V | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
54 | MODANLOU Navid | V D D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
55 | CHEN Bowen | V V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
56 | NAKAS Levent | D D V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
57 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | D V V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
58 | AHMED Mohsen | V V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
59 | GINZBURG Adam | D V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
60 | LOUIE Joseph | V D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
61 | LIU Bryan | D D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
62 | MOORE Alexander | D D D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
63 | KIM Julian | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
64 | WU Johnny y. | D D D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
65 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | V V D V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
66 | LI zerong | D V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
67 | SAUNIER Cameron | V V V D D V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
68 | PEREZ Daniel | V V V V D D | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
69 | KOFMAN David | V D V V V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
70 | ALI Farhan | V V V D D V | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
70 | WONG Baron | D V V V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
72 | REAGAN Henry | D V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
73 | GUO Woody | D V D V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
74 | AYOTTE James | V D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
75 | SUN Neo | D V D V | D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
76 | ZHOU Shawn | D D V V D V | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
77 | RAHMAN Ali | D D D V V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
78 | HERNDON Liam | D D D V V V | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
79 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | D D D V V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
80 | SUMA Marvin | V V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
81 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | D D V V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
82 | LIU Yueri | V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
83 | LIU Zicheng | D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
84 | OLSON Joseph | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
85 | MARENCIK Miles | D D V D V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
86 | KIM Teddy | D V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
87 | HSU Joshua | D D V V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
88 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
89 | CARTY JR Johndale | D V D D D V | D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
90 | PAN Anthony | D V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
91 | KIM Remington | D D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
91 | GOODMAN Benjamin | V D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
93 | KUANG Bryan | D D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
94 | RAHMAN Zayd | V D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
94 | GOWDA Suyog | V D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
96 | SHILOV Maxim | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
97 | YAO Tristan | D V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
98 | YALAMANCHILI Anvith | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
99 | LIDSKY Phineas | D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
100 | YILMAZ Tarik | V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
101 | SHERLOCK Roderick | D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
102 | GREENMAN Duke | D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
103 | SIEDOW William | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
104 | SHAFFER Tyler | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
105 | LEE Inwoo | D D D D V D | D | 4.0 | 1 | -3.0 |
106 | NAEMI Barsam | V D D D D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
107 | LOISEAU Oscar | V D D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
108 | NAM Nathaniel | D D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
109 | WANG Devin | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
110 | LEE Daniel | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
110 | ABAD Mateo | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
112 | MIZRACHI Aaron | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
113 | YUE Bryan | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
114 | LI Timothy | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
114 | CAMPOS Sebastian | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
116 | POHL Philip | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
117 | JIANG Aaron | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
118 | LU Haoyang | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
119 | CHO Sean | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
120 | AUYEUNG Aedan Ho lam | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
121 | SATHYAN Dev | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
122 | VEERAVALLI Pranav | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
122 | HUANG Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
122 | MIZRACHI Moisés | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
125 | QIU William | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
126 | PURUSHOTHAM Neil | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
127 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
128 | PLUMMER Kellan | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.