Fencing Institute of Texas, Inc. - Carrollton, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MAISONET-GUZMAN Hector E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | |
| 2 | MOLCHAN Yury | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | |
| 3 | REAGAN Dustin R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% |
| 3 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 5 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 22% | 2% | |
| 6 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 99% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | |
| 7 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 2% | |
| 8 | PLAISANCE Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 53% | |
| 9 | CARDENAS Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 6% | - |
| 10 | LUEBBE Jost | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 26% | |
| 11 | RIBAUDO David J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 17% | 1% | |
| 12 | VAUGHN Matthew (Manny) E. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | EMMERT JP | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 14 | SAYLOR Harrison G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% | |
| 15 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 16 | MORA Johan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | - |
| 17 | BRUS Brian V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
| 18 | WIEGAND-SHAHANI Braden M. | 100% | 97% | 68% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | GRAY Connor W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 21 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 22 | MCMAHAN Christopher D. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | ELLISOR Drayten | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 21% | 3% | |
| 24 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | POOLE James M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% | 1% | |
| 26 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 100% | 99% | 74% | 31% | 7% | - | |
| 27 | LEE Nathan | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 28 | TALLEY Blake | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 29 | TIEMANN Landen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | - | |
| 30 | MORRIS Quentin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | - | |
| 31 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 83% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
| 32 | LU Haoyang | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 33 | GRINBERG Ethan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | VILLAREAL Quentin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 35 | BARTON Christian | 100% | 85% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | DADE Augustus | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | ZANKOWSKI Corey | 100% | 86% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | NEFF Allen | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.